FaceID… not just about your iPhone

Make sure that nothing is covering your face

Make sure that your eyes, nose, and mouth are fully visible to the TrueDepth camera. Face ID doesn't work if anything is covering your mouth and nose, like a face mask. If you're wearing a face mask, you'll be asked to enter your passcode automatically after swiping up.

…The results indicate that responses to familiar versus unfamiliar faces, but not familiar versus unfamiliar objects, are related to the child’s age. Children of all ages showed differential responses to familiar versus unfamiliar objects, with larger amplitude Nc and P400 components to the unfamiliar toy than to the familiar toy.

…In contrast, children’s responses to familiar and unfamiliar faces varied as a function of the age of the child. The youngest children, between 18 and 24 months of age, showed greater ERP responses to the mother’s face than to a stranger’s face.

…Children between 24 and 45 months of age did not show differential brain activity in response to a mother’s and a stranger’s faces, suggesting that this may be a transitional point in development.

It can be expected, from a developmental perspective, that the brain systems involved in social behaviors would change in conjunction with the formation of the attachment relationships. For example, the primary caregiver plays an increasingly important role in the life of the child as the relationship between the infant and mother progresses. If social–emotional behavioral changes can be related to brain functioning, the changing role of the mother should be apparent in developmental changes in neural correlates of cognitive and social responses to the primary caregiver.

…The present results provide support for the view that face processing changes with increased expertise for faces. The developmental trajectory of the electrophysiological response to faces in the present study parallels developmental changes in the significance of different kinds of faces for children. During the months when the primary attachment relationship is being forged, infants and toddlers can be thought of as forming expertise for a specific face — that of the primary caregiver — as the person with whom the child is forming a special bond. After the establishment of this relationship, children can be thought of as more general “face experts,” and can devote additional resources to learning about other faces.

…It is important to note that in the present study only the response to the mother’s face varied with age. Thus, it is not the case that younger toddlers are disinterested in strangers’ faces. Instead, it appears that children of all ages attend equally to strangers, but that younger children devote an especially large amount of attention to their mother’s face as well. This finding is consistent with the well-established finding that infants and young children are very interested in faces in general from a very early age (Goren, Sarty, & Wu, 1975).

…Overall, our results suggest that face processing is a developmental phenomenon. The neural correlates of face recognition vary with children’s age, and the degree of attentional resources they devote to processing faces may differ depending on the significance of the face during a particular point in development. Future studies should examine these age-related changes longitudinally, and with consideration for the social and cognitive tasks with which the child is engaged.


The difficulty in determining what facial expression a person is exhibiting behind a mask may present challenges for infants and young children as they depend on their parents’ facial expressions, coupled with tone and/or voice to regulate their reactions toward others. Health professionals should understand the potential effects of prolonged mask wearing to minimise any potential long-term impact on neonatal development and optimise psychological outcomes for babies, infants, children and their parents.

droplet evaporation

where is the safest place to have a large droplet evaporate?

infectious-transmission.jpg

It is the essence of disease transmission that infectious viruses are carried by droplets. After being exhaled from the host, the droplets will conduct heat, participate in mass transfer, and undergo an evaporation exchange with the environment. The viral survival condition, such as saltwater, nutrient, salt, pH, temperature, and humidity balance, are significantly influenced by various environmental factors. The viruses can only enter the host “luckily” and cause infection when the concentration is sufficient and the virus is still alive, which is unfortunate for the susceptible population. Thus, the different risk of when and how to contact the infectious viruses is the most important question that should be answered, to provide a reference for early isolation and the mask dispute.

Based on the different particle sizes, we conducted an in-depth review on the physical processes and transmission risks of viral infections caused by infectious droplets at different time points. We found that the viral load of large droplets was several orders of magnitude larger than that of small droplets. The disease transmission ability of large droplets at the initial moment is significantly higher than that of small droplets. Furthermore, during the transmission process, the original large droplets evaporation takes longer, and the survival condition balance of active viruses is better maintained, and becomes a high-risk small droplet nuclei carrying a massive number of active viruses after evaporation. Compared with the original small droplets, whose internal viruses are quickly evaporated and inactivated, the risk difference of disease transmission between the two is even greater, which also confirmed the dominant position of large droplets in disease transmission.

posterior vitreous detachment

A posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) is a condition of the eye in which the vitreous membraneseparates from the retina. It refers to the separation of the posterior hyaloid membrane from the retina anywhere posterior to the vitreous base (a 3–4 mm wide attachment to the ora serrata).

The condition is common for older adults; over 75% of those over the age of 65 develop it. Although less common among people in their 40s or 50s, the condition is not rare for those individuals. Some research has found that the condition is more common among women.

When this occurs there is a characteristic pattern of symptoms:

  • Flashes of light (photopsia)

  • A sudden dramatic increase in the number of floaters

  • A ring of floaters or hairs just to the temporal side of the central vision

As a posterior vitreous detachment proceeds, adherent vitreous membrane may pull on the retina. While there are no pain fibers in the retina, vitreous traction may stimulate the retina, with resultant flashes that can look like a perfect circle.

If a retinal vessel is torn, the leakage of blood into the vitreous cavity is often perceived as a "shower" of floaters. Retinal vessels may tear in association with a retinal tear, or occasionally without the retina being torn

the difficulties of math

IMG_8940.jpeg

…The model's conclusion: On any given day, the actual number of active cases — people who are newly infected or still infectious — is likely 10 times that day's official number of reported cases.

https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesper100klast7days

https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#cases_casesper100klast7days

26,939,515 x 10 = 260,939,515

Estimated United States population 330,074,711.

Estimated United States population 330,074,711.

260,939,516 / 330,074,711

= 79.1 % already infected

However the above comes from reading the headline. Looking at the underlining more conservative presentation of data:

IMG_8942.jpeg

The sustained periods of high transmission in the U.S. also mean that by now, quite a large share of the U.S. population has been infected beyond what the tallies of reported cases would indicate. Nationwide, Shaman estimates that about 120 million people have now been infected, just over a third of the U.S. population.

using the above statistic:

120,000,000 estimated cases / 26,963,516 CDC cases

= 4.45 times more cases than CDC has reported.

Would this not also equally mean that COVID-19 is 77.5% less deadly than being reported?

i.e. If there are five times the infections than have been currently reported by CDC, would that not also mean that percentage fatality rate has to be 20 percent of what current CDC is been reporting?

Accuracy in infection and mortality data is if course important for understanding and making policy decisions.

It would seem the math points toward herd immunity of a less (than originally suspected) fatal disease. Else, the only things that would justify an ever-present-ongoing-policy of recommending/requiring multiple masks, social distancing, and business/social lockdowns, where the vast majority of individuals have either had already COVID and recovered or been vaccinated for it, would be concerns of short-term immunity, and/or mutations, and/or the often cited “asymptomatic” spreading. Those topics deserve further study/exploration.

the difference between doing what is easy versus what is effective

IMG_9110.gif

The streetlight effect, or the drunkard's search principle, is a type of observational bias that occurs when people only search for something where it is easiest to look. Both names refer to a well-known joke:

A policeman sees a drunk man (wearing a pair of goggles) searching for something under a streetlight and asks what the drunk has lost. He says he lost his keys (the policeman puts on a pair of goggles) and they both look under the streetlight together. After a few minutes the policeman asks if he is sure he lost them here, and the drunk replies, no, and that he lost them in the park. The policeman asks why he is searching here, and the drunk replies, "this is where the light is".

The anecdote goes back at least to the 1920s, and has been used metaphorically in the social sciences since at least 1964, when Abraham Kaplan referred to it as "the principle of the drunkard's search". The anecdote has also been attributed to Nasreddin. According to Idries Shah, this tale is used by many Sufis, commenting upon people who seek exotic sources for enlightenment.